阿根廷的成功证明了，当一支球队的所有球员都紧紧团结在一起，并愿意为战术体系牺牲个人数据时，他们就能爆发出超越身价的强大能量。

茅台涨了100元，白酒还欠3000亿

83312 ★

摘要：比梅西和C罗年轻一大截的姆巴佩，走的是一条“既要控股、又要投人”的混合路线。

” 普冉股份：上半年净利同比预增1925%，通用存储芯片量价改善 7月23日，普冉股份公告称，预计2026年半年度归属于母公司所有者的净利润约为8.25亿元，同比增长1925.36%。

1、博亚平台首轮对阵卡塔尔，瑞士全场控球率68%，轰出26脚射门却只收获一粒点球，补时阶段被对手头球绝平，暴露出阵地攻坚效率偏低的问题。

拉齐奥则在最近加入了竞争，准备提出一份200万欧元租借费加1800万欧元买断选项的报价，总价值2000万。博亚平台胜率高达90%，意味着大部分时候都能赚钱；第二种要经常面对亏损，情绪肯定波动大，怎么看都不靠谱。

2、上半年多笔补助、补贴资金下达！

不足四万平，轻松玩一天时隔一年，大型游乐设施的增加是乐园最显性的变化。

3、火箭战胜开拓者乌度卡终于意识到问题所在最佳解决方案已经浮现

早在2023年夏天，就有过他可能转会米兰的传闻，但最终红黑军团一口气签下了赖因德斯、穆萨、奇克3名中场，而拉齐奥从法兰克福免签了日本人。

4、“澳门8分钟”青年导演扶持计划入选短片项目官宣

朋友转了一圈，发现实际只用了约50平方米的货柜板材，账单上却写着80平方米。

5、一直以为狄波拉够美，看清甄珍样貌才明白谢贤执念一生不是没缘由

报告摘要这群人通常受教育程度不低，有一定消费能力，也拥有很强的自我分析欲望。

距离富拉尼、蒙卡达、塔雷与阿莱格里被集体解雇已经过去一周，AC米兰至今没有发布任何一项新的任命，管理层和体育部门的核心岗位全部处于真空状态，而意甲转会窗已经确定提前至6月29日开启，对于米兰这样体量的俱乐部来说，如果迟迟无法确定主帅和总监人选，意味着从季前备战到引援谈判，每一个环节都会陷入被动。

阿斯顿维拉留住了埃梅里，这很好，但他们的核心球员正在被豪门逐个挖走。

6、每天84拖地致肺炎！居家消毒剂用不对反成肺部“刺客”

最离谱的是曼联球迷，他们剪辑了托纳利三次传球失误的视频——那是一场在训练基地闭门进行的季前热身赛，对手是MK Dons，他全场70脚传球就失误了3次。

问题是，如果每个人都希望对方提供情绪价值，谁来承担供给？《问题青年》一期节目曾追问，当情绪被平台按照标签快速生产和满足，我们获得的究竟是理解，还是别人已经替我们完成的一次情绪宣泄。

7、希罗：想努力走出和阿德巴约的冲突专注与雄鹿向前看

有人适合去大厂镀金，有人适合在小地方练全活。

这场反差并非第一次出现。

8、沿河农信社被罚45万，涉理事未经任职资格核准实际履职等

CONTEXT 于4月15日发布的报告显示，2025年Q4，全球 3D 打印硬件系统收入同比增长 25%；其中，2500 美元以下的入门级 3D 打印机出货量同比增长 47%，带动该价格带收入增长 53%。

一旦Coding和Agent能力被追平，企业客户和开发者的迁移成本可能低于外界想象。

"费兰……费兰……费兰……" 多年来，围绕费兰·托雷斯的喧嚣，是他必须学会去承受的东西。

9、在一场名为“委托”的梦里，捡回爱的能力

原本是一份有点难看的简历，突然成了一场尚未抵达伊萨卡的远航。

全球最大黄金ETF——SPDR Gold Trust持仓已连续四日获资金流入，从7月17日的999吨增至7月23日的1009.3吨，累计增持超10吨。

10、既不让去NBA，也不给上场机会！日韩篮协的做法，值得郭士强学习

这让 3D 打印的关键链路变短了：从“我想打印一个东西”，到“机器开始工作”，中间少了很多过去只有老玩家才能跨过去的台阶。

这类组织在财报上是成本，在服务上是承诺。

1、单场63+21詹姆斯离开CBA！官宣加盟韩国K联赛已效力天津4年

阿根廷队在世界杯半决赛2比1逆转击败英格兰队后，球员们在场上展示了一面涉及马尔维纳斯群岛的旗帜，可能因此面临国际足联的纪律处罚。

2、CBA新赛季三外援，广东队提前续约双小外，朱芳雨积极寻找大外援

同时，NAND Flash晶圆供应端扩产周期较长，供需关系趋紧推动存储产品价格上涨。

3、包揽6项大奖，连续三年排西部第1，打破冠军魔咒，他们成最大赢家

当词汇只是扶手，它们能帮助人站起来；当词汇被当成答案，现实反而容易消失。2026世界杯奖金出炉：小组赛出局拿900万，冠军球员能分多少？76次夺回球权，一对一对抗成功率50.67%——这样的防守投入程度，很难让教练组对他另眼相看。

4、董路回应孙继海：你有什么资格评价我我做的事你没做过不是对手

如果佩德罗拉以100万至150万欧元的价格完成永久转会，按照当初约定的分成条款，巴萨将获得转会费的一半，桑普多利亚拿走另外50%。

5、上海后卫欲被交易，韩硕张兆旭加盟北控，郭昊文出战NBA夏季联赛

拿我那个二本同学举例。

6、伟大胜利！温网捷报: 中国金花首夺大满贯冠军平分奖金690万奖金

面对强大的阿根廷，这三名球员只能寄望于图赫尔在战术上做出变通，或至少在替补席上给予他们证明自己的机会。

储能既是保障供电连续性的最后防线，也是压缩交付周期的加速器。

从纸面实力来看，葡萄牙无疑是更被看好的一方。

7、浙江男篮确定新外援，和1米88控卫完成签约，意甲联赛场均18+3+3

而在近两个月来，市场早已传出耐克拟收回滔搏等经销商线上经销权限的传闻，如今随着两份公告落地，这一渠道变革正式落锤。

但现实情况不容乐观，米兰中场目前有七名球员竞争两个主力位置，即便考虑到欧联杯的多线作战，人员储备也过于臃肿。

8、中国工程院院士陆建勋逝世，享年97岁

在短短4场比赛中，他狂轰3球并送出2次助攻，一人独造5球，以20岁的年纪成为世界杯赛场上最耀眼的超新星之一。

萨拉赫和马尔穆什的组合贡献了4球2助攻，是球队前进的核心动力。

而小米上调出货目标，且把增量部分投向低端机型的原因，则在于上游供应链的变化。

本届世界杯，库巴西用沉稳老练的表现征服了所有人，荣膺赛事最佳年轻球员。

英锦赛特鲁姆普遭爆冷无缘16强李行6-4胜傅家俊现役首例！库里获篮球名人堂专属展区 7月24日揭幕火箭战胜奇才猛龙为何不包夹杜兰特乌度卡的篮球哲学显露无疑无缘CBA下赛季的四位顶尖外援

关联文章推荐

加载更多

网站提醒和声明

博亚平台7月22日，国内头部经销商滔搏、宝胜先后发布公告，确认耐克产品线上平台销售将于2027年1月1日起全面终止。申请删除>> 纠错>> 投诉侵权>> 平台自有内容（文字、图片、界面、榜单、商标、LOGO 等）知识产权归本站所有，未经书面许可，禁止复制、转载、商用。

提交说明：快速提交发布>> 查看提交帮助>> 注册登录>>

赞 82522

踩 11279

最新评论

用户评论62049

请先登录后再发表评论发布

相关推荐

具身智能赛道看起来拥挤，但大量公司目前仍以机器人本体、运动控制或场景交付为主。

仁爱礁刚交锋，美澳48小时内火速站台！中方不惯着：立刻拖走破船

40044

如今，他终于来到了自己一直想来的地方。[2026]

【CBA联赛】第十九轮｜逆转取胜！浙江稠州金租85-82胜上海久事！

18053

他非常善于通过拦截和抢断为本队赢回球权，空中对抗能力也极为出色——本赛季他在英超打入9球，比维尔茨和伊萨克两人加起来还多。

首发实录

34664

然而，也正是这份乐观，导致礼来在2013年遭遇巨大的“瓶颈”。

林诗栋蒯曼全锦赛混双夺冠

16501

也就是说，买100张卡的钱，有30张卡的时间在干等数据。

招聘专栏

18558

Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。

太离谱了！文班亚马12个大帽！创造NBA季后赛历史

48796

18岁的追风少年欧文横空出世，用一记千里走单骑的破门惊艳世界；然而，贝克汉姆却因对西蒙尼的报复性动作被红牌罚下。

梅西落泪！恩佐揭露原因：与足球没有关系

35736

图：百忧解化学式 2003年，迪马基最终选择离开工作了22年的礼来，转而去成为连续创业者。

正式确定！北京首钢新帅公布，前中国男篮主教练上任，冲击总冠军

61450

阿克曼在2020年退出信用对冲时，并不知道市场是否见底。

滴滴开放日走进预警中心监督一场“安全接力赛”

60324

对此，北交所问询要求公司说明关联方资金拆借相关内控运行有效性。

张雪峰曾说过，真正有远见的父母，不会把小学六年浪费在钢琴、机器人、舞蹈等兴趣班

96671

加载更多